When Should a Church Disclose That It Used AI?

By Mark Sentell · August 29, 2026 · 2 min read ·

Diogenes sits in his barrel lighting the lantern he carried in search of an honest man.
Jean-Léon Gérôme, Diogenes, 1860. Walters Art Museum. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

Does the church need to tell people every time AI touched something? If the pastor used a grammar checker on the newsletter, does that need a footnote?

No. But some uses do need disclosure. The question isn’t really about technology. It’s about what people are trusting you for.

The principle: authenticity

Our church’s AI policy puts it this way: our congregation trusts that what is spoken from the pulpit, written in a pastoral letter, or shared in a counseling session comes from a real person who has wrestled with God’s Word and applied it through lived experience. That trust is sacred.

Paul wrote, “We have renounced disgraceful, underhanded ways. We refuse to practice cunning or to tamper with God’s word, but by the open statement of the truth we would commend ourselves to everyone’s conscience in the sight of God” (2 Corinthians 4:2). An open statement of the truth includes the truth about how something was made, when it matters.

So disclosure should follow trust. Where people reasonably believe a human did the work, and that belief matters to them, tell them when a machine did a meaningful part of it.

Usually no disclosure needed

  • Grammar and spell-checking
  • Internal administration: scheduling, agendas, meeting summaries
  • Personal study that informs your thinking but doesn’t directly produce what people receive

Nobody expects a handwritten staff agenda.

Disclose to your team

  • Sermons and teaching where AI played a significant role beyond editing or transcription. Our policy asks the preacher to tell the team. Telling the congregation is encouraged but left to pastoral discretion.

Disclose to the person

  • Pastoral care. If AI generated language you use in a care context, a letter to a grieving family or a response to a hard question, the person should know. Researching a topic with AI before a conversation doesn’t need disclosure. Handing someone AI words as your own does.

Always review

  • Anything congregant-facing, like newsletters, emails, and social posts, should be reviewed and approved by a human before it goes out, whether or not you label it.

A simple test

Ask: If this person found out later how this was made, would they feel deceived?

If yes, disclose now. It’s always better to say “I had help with this” than to be found out.

How I handle it here

On this site I say plainly how I use AI. My articles and books come from my own sermons, writing, and ministry. AI is a capable assistant and a conversation partner in shaping that material, and I’m the final editor of everything under my name. You can read the whole statement here.

That’s the kind of plain disclosure I’d encourage any pastor to adopt. People don’t need you to avoid every tool. They need to know they can trust you.


I help churches write disclosure practices and AI policies that protect trust. I’m a pastor with more than twenty years in business and technology. If that would help your church, here’s how I work.

Enjoyed this article?